Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
We develop a systematic framework for the spin adaptation of the cumulants of p-particle reduced density matrices (RDMs), with explicit constructions for p = 1 to 3. These spin-adapted cumulants enable rigorous treatment of both Ŝz and Ŝ2 symmetries in quantum systems, providing a foundation for spin-resolved electronic structure methods. We show that complete spin adaptation—referred to as completeS-representability—can be enforced by constraining the variances of Ŝz and Ŝ2, which require the 2-RDM and 4-RDM, respectively. Importantly, the cumulants of RDMs scale linearly with system size—size-extensive—making them a natural object for incorporating spin symmetries in scalable electronic structure theories. The developed formalism is applicable to density-based methods, one-particle RDM functional theories, and two-particle RDM methods. We further extend the approach to spin–orbit-coupled systems via total angular momentum adaptation. Beyond spin, the framework enables the adaptation of RDM theories to additional symmetries through the construction of suitable irreducible tensor operators.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available July 28, 2026
-
This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with artificial intelligence (AI) components. Specifically, machine learning (ML) components in cyber-physical systems (CPS), such as feedforward neural networks used as feedback controllers in closed-loop systems, are considered, which is a class of systems classically known as intelligent control systems, or in more modern and specific terms, neural network control systems (NNCS). We broadly refer to this category as AI and NNCS (AINNCS). The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2024. In the 8th edition of this AINNCS category at ARCH-COMP, five tools have been applied to solve 12 benchmarks, which are CORA, CROWN-Reach, GoTube, JuliaReach, and NNV. This is the year with the largest interest in the community, with two new, and three previous participants. Following last year’s trend, despite the additional challenges presented, the verification results have improved year-over-year. In terms of computation time, we can observe that the previous participants have improved as well, showing speed-ups of up to one order of magnitude, such as JuliaReach on the TORA benchmark with ReLU controller, and NNV on the TORA benchmark with both heterogeneous controllers.more » « less
-
This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with artificial intelligence (AI) components. Specifically, machine learning (ML) components in cyber-physical systems (CPS), such as feedforward neural networks used as feedback controllers in closed-loop systems are considered, which is a class of systems classically known as intelligent control systems, or in more modern and specific terms, neural network control systems (NNCS). We more broadly refer to this category as AI and NNCS (AINNCS). The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2021. In the third edition of this AINNCS category at ARCH-COMP, three tools have been applied to solve seven different benchmark problems, (in alphabetical order): JuliaReach, NNV, and Verisig. JuliaReach is a new participant in this category, Verisig participated previously in 2019 and NNV has participated in all previous competitions. This report is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks for which these tools are suited. Due to the diversity of problems, lack of a shared hardware platform, and the early stage of the competition, we are not ranking tools in terms of performance, yet the presented results combined with 2020 results probably provide the most complete assessment of current tools for safety verification of NNCS.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
